Friday, March 22, 2013

Geo. Wallace Riot


This incident, this near riot occurred years ago, but its sounds still echo in my head. Hundreds of screaming, angry voices, hell bent on destruction announced the mob's presence, reverberating down the concrete canyons of the city’s buildings like a chorus of banshees. As it drew nearer sounds other than human voices could be discerned: the repeated concussive thump of fists pounding on car hoods and doors, the tinkling of glass as store windows were smashed, the resounding crashes of what must have been shelving being tipped over and smashing to the floor.

On this night, my Dad and I were leaving a hotel in New York City. I had accompanied him to a ratification meeting for his union and we’d now head home via mass transit. The cold air greeted us as we walked out into the night, suggesting snow, ice and the havoc it wreaks were about a month away. Dad and I pulled up our collars and were on our way.

After walking only a few steps I heard the rapidly approaching commotion. I turned to my Father and asked, "What's going on?" But he had already evaluated the situation, took me by the hand and said in a voice that left no question as to its meaning, "LET'S GO." And we did. At first Dad didn't run but set a brisk pace that forced me to trot every few paces just to keep up with him. But after the bright flash and subsequent explosion of a car, undoubtedly the work of more malevolent members of the angry throng, run we did.

The date was 10/24/1968 and Presidential candidate George Wallace had just spread his racist vitriol to 16,000 wildly enthusiastic supporters at NY’s old Madison Square Garden located on 8th Avenue. His rise to popularity in a nation just awakening to equality standards began five years previously when the US Supreme Court took a firm stand on desegregating schools. In Alabama, then Governor Wallace decided he would not obey the law and blocked African American students from entering the University of Alabama. That is, until Federal Marshals and the National Guard persuaded him otherwise. The fallout from Wallace’s confrontation with the government firmly crowned him as the de facto leader of segregationists.

As was typical during the Viet Nam war era, college-aged protesters disagreeing with Wallace’s political leanings assembled outside the Garden. Talking, chanting and singing, they had whipped themselves into their own ideological frenzy and now needed to express their emotions. And my Dad and I were on a collision course with this madness.

We needed to get to the Port Authority Bus Station about ten blocks away. As we trotted along, we didn’t speak but I could see the concern etched on my Dad’s face. In practically no time we and a small crowd of other people covered one, then two, then three blocks, all without incident. Angry shouts and screams of the mob came & went, bouncing off the building, carried by the wind so we couldn’t tell exactly where it was at any time. Police sirens now joined in the cacophonous symphony, a sign that at least some semblance of civilized society existed somewhere. Perhaps because of this we all slowed to a fast walk, and then to more of a leisurely stroll after going another two blocks.

Suddenly, my Dad stumbled and immediately clutched his left hand and I heard a glass bottle smash on the ground near him. Even in the poor luminescence cast by the overhead streetlamps I could recognize the crimson color of blood as it dripped from his hand. There, directly ahead of us, individuals were pouring into the intersection, filling it up like ants converging on a bread crumb. “Dad,” I screamed, “You’re bleeding!”

But he had already taken out his handkerchief, wrapped it around his injured hand and yanked it tight with his teeth. I was reminded this man had served in the Navy in WWII and witnessed its horrors first hand. He wouldn’t be deterred by a cut on his hand.
Grabbing my left with his good right hand, we ran after the others in our group and quickly veered into an alley. It was here, in the garbage strewn, two-car wide darkened expanse between adjacent buildings that I realized the strongest memory of that evening.

At one end of the alley, our group congregated, huffing and wheezing from the sprint we had just made. Then, at the other, members of the mob started to appear, backlit by streetlamps, jeering, gesticulating and shouting obscenities at us. But unnoticed in the middle of the alley until what appeared to be a flashlight illuminated its interior was a car. No engine was running, no voices were heard; just the light moving around inside. Then, a movement in the car drew the attention of groups at either end of the alley. Other than noise from the mob coursing through adjacent streets an eerie silence blanketed the little section of the city we occupied. What was going on inside that car? A clue was revealed as one of the doors opened slightly and the interior light went on.

A man slowly exited the vehicle. It was a Police officer – the biggest man I have ever seen outside of a professional athlete. There was no point of reference but he must have been about 6’10” tall. Although dressed in riot gear: helmet, protective vest, high leather boots and a belt with dangerous looking appurtenances, easily the most intimidating part of his outfit was the baton he held in his arms. This tree trunk of a weapon must have been at least 48” long; a full four feet if an inch. And the giant brandished it with absolutely no difficulty at all. He stood next to the car, legs slightly apart, holding the baton in his right hand and slowly tapping it into the palm of his left, over and over. His message was painfully clear: disband or be broken, probably in half.

A combination of police sirens, screeching tires and crowd noise then broke the spell that had held us all as the rest of the mob was now being round up by the authorities. In a few short months, Wallace became a has-been, segregation became a reality and the unrest of the 60s and 70s were relegated to the annals of history.

In New York City on the night of 10/24/1968, I watched with the eyes of a child but began to understand the mind of men.

Saturday, March 16, 2013

$2 Billion for Alternative Energy Research

As the headline below indicates, the President is setting aside $2 billion for alternative energy research. But isn't this a case of déjà vu all over again? Haven't we heard this before? And does anyone really think the oil companies will sit back, let the rug be pulled out from under them and go off quietly into the night? Surely, they'll want a slice, or rather, the whole pie of this new initiative. Let's face it - if tomorrow it was determined that ground glass could operate cars instead of gas, Big Oil would own all the grinders and charge $4.00/pound for their efforts.

In the early 1960s, then President Kennedy said America would put a man on the moon by the end of the decade. Of course that goal was achieved, and the residual inventions that were realized (think computers, baby) changed the world forever.

Just imagine if President Obama challenged American industry to a similar goal...to create an EFFICIENT energy alternative to oil? Our country would once again become a technological world leader, with even China playing catch up.

Why can't anyone see this? (And yes, I know about the Solyndra debacle; simply throwing money at a problem without accountability has been proven precisely how not to solve it.)


Obama & Energy Research Funds

Crows & Brimstone

Sometimes I put the wrong octane rating of gas in my car. Other times I've been known to make a left-hand turn in my car instead of a right. But one thing I DO know is when an author of a book spins a tight, concise tale, yet still manages to draw in my interest. Writers Douglas Preston & Lincoln Child (“Still Life With Crows,” “Brimstone,” etc.) have effectively done this to me, enticing me to return to their FBI Special Agent Aloysius Pendergast books like a teenage boy on a second date after hitting a grand slam on the first. But a little background information is needed before I discuss particulars used by my current favorite authors.

Perhaps I've drawn you in right here, reading this post. (Apparently so since you're still plowing along!) I'm using the first person point of view (POV) here, speaking to you as if I'm sitting here, right next to you. Notice how I’m continually using the pronoun “I?” That’s an immediate give-away when you’re immersed in a book featuring the first person. Limitations to this method, as you can probably imagine, are if I can't see, feel hear or otherwise sense something, it can't be included in my conversation here.

There are three other methods of story delivery. The second person POV is generally used in genres catering to video games, self-help and travel articles. The pronoun “you” presents itself conspicuously in these works. And books written in the third person have the pronouns he, she and they dispersed generously throughout the story.

That leaves us with the final device of this category. It’s called the omniscient POV. An author using this method tells us a story from an all-knowing, god-like view point. Every single detail, nuance, feeling and fact, no matter how trivial, is presented to us via the god-like individual in a third person narrative. Omniscient also means past and future events can be revealed to us, too. A sub-category of the omniscient POV is the limited POV. This simply means while that same all-knowing viewpoint is utilized only one character is speaking or thinking at a time. And now, faster than our teenage friend up above can utter, “of course I love you,” I’ll switch back to my main men, authors Preston & Child.

Using a limited omniscient POV, our authors of note let us know what’s transpiring in their stories, advancing plots along steadily & assuredly. But I’ve noticed another interesting device used in the Pendergast stories. In both “Still Life With Crows” and “Brimstone,” a character close to Pendergast is used to ask those questions we’d ask if we were on the crime scene with him. In “Crows”, Corrie Swanson is a young Goth girl who is taken under the Special Agent’s wing. She, in turn, becomes a first hand witness to his indiosyncrasies, reactions to situations, ask clarifying questions what we’d ask them, etc. In “Brimstone”, Sgt. Vincent D’Agosta performs similar duties.

Granted I’ve only read the two books in this series but I believe by now inconsistencies in their stories would have been flushed out. All aspects in the stories have come to, IMHO, successful conclusions. In all fairness, I did uncover one area that had me a bit confused. While questioning the CEO of a company in “Crows,” Pendergast apparently guesses the combination of a safe. I note guesses because we aren’t informed if the numbers he recited to the CEO was, in fact, the safe’s combination. I thought this apparent oversight odd for the otherwise tightly knit story lines constructed by Preston & Child.

That said, you can start their series with “Relic.” But be warned – you’re apt to miss scheduled appointments, burn your dinner and if you dare read at night, oversleep the next morning. These books are extremely engrossing.

The Vacillating Senator

Headline: "G.O.P. Senator Says He Has a Gay Son, and Backs Gay Marriage." This joker was anti-gay until his son announced his interests. So I'm a bit confused here. If Senator Porter's a Republican & aligned himself with their platform, how can he change his view on this matter? And what of his constituency? If THEY are have a penchant towards a decidedly anti-gay stance, doesn't he have an obligation to listen to those same voters?

Look at the hypocrisy of his position. A democracy is a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections. With the operative phrase for our purpose in that last sentence "a system of representation," Porter is supposed to REPRESENT his constituency, not vacillate as fits his whim & fancy.

So, where the hell he get the right to do what he wants & the screw over the voters?


The Art of Vacillation

Thursday, March 14, 2013

Better NOT Fly Those Friendly Skies


After the 9/11 tragedies, the Transportation Safety Administration (TSA) was beefed up to be certain such incidents could not happen again. So when an undercover inspector for the TSA hid a fake bomb under his clothing on Feb. 25, 2013 and was cleared through not one but two separate security checkpoints at Newark International Airport, it was all the more disturbing.

In part, the First Amendment, Section 8 of our Constitution states: "Congress shall have power to...provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States." Therefore, we have the right to expect our government will protect us from harm. Considering the TSA has dropped the ball and put US citizens in harm's way, it appears that someone, somewhere has definitely violated its obligation to the people.

The same First Amendment allows freedom of the press. More specifically, it permits newspapers, radio and broadcast media to inform the public of such a breach of security to the world. And thus the problem; the proverbial genie is now out of the bottle. With full knowledge of this incident, armed terrorists waltzing through airport security is now only a numbers game. What’s meant by this?


Stay with me here: the goal will now be to flood lines waiting to board jets with numerous bomb-carrying murderers, knowing at least one of them could very well get aboard a flight. And recently, the TSA allowed small knives to be carried on board. Such are the ingredients that comprise a recipe for disaster.

You now have to wonder…how long until terrorists make it through "security" & board your flight...or a loved one's?